Articles From The Classical Teacher
Heroism
by Evan Wilson
Classical Teacher, 2004
When it comes to history, rhetoric comes before grammar...
| Battle
is the ultimate moment in the seeking of boundaries. Man
always wants to know if the line he defends can be stepped
beyond or if that one step will mean defeat. It is the
focus of the passion of the greatest force in the story
of history. |
What has the teaching of
history become in private
Christian establishments?
Here is a section out of a
commonly used Christian school textbook,
slightly rewritten to protect the innocent
(namely myself), but preserving the idea of
the original:
During the Second Punic War (278 -
202 B.C.) Hannibal, the famed
Carthaginian general, crossed over the
Alps into Italy with an army of men and
elephants. Although at the Battle of
Cannae, he virtually annihilated the
Romans, Hannibal did not have the
resources to follow up his victory and
besiege Rome herself.
Eventually, Hannibal was forced out
of Italy and returned to Carthage in
North Africa, where he lost the Battle of
Zama to Scipio in 202 B.C. The
Carthaginians were forced to make
peace and give up their empire, and
had to pay tribute to the Romans.
The glory, the greatness of the Second
Punic War in two tidy paragraphs.
Where is the fear inspired in small Roman
children for centuries after by the phrase
''Hannibal at the gates!" The Wellington/Nelson-like status of the Scipio African us
has been swept away. It is no small
wonder the children we teach don't see the
point of leaming all these names and
dates. They should call our schools
''lchabod,'' for the glory has departed.
The Problem in Teaching History
Why do children remember every
moment (even the exact dialogue) in an
adventure movie they see? It's because
the movie-makers teach them a story, a
fiction to be sure, but they teach them
nonetheless. Not only do they teach but
they teach so effectively that these
movies, in some ways, have a permanent
influence on our children. So, in some
cases, we wring our hands and call for
stricter rating systems or channel blockers.
Yet, while we often criticize the
content of popular movies, we should
seize upon the utterly effective storytelling
method that so completely captures our
childrens' attention. For we too have a
story to teach, one that is true and thus
deserves to have a permanent influence.
Where do we go wrong? Instead of
capitalizing on the saga, the "theatrics",
what do we do? We teach them a little
song about presidents, memorize dates
and produce timelines. In many ways we
have the stuff of history backwards. lf the
child had to sit through all the commentary
and science of cinema in the DVD extras
before they could watch the movie they
would just volunteer to go to their room
and play. The grammar of a story is studied
last. If first it deadens the subject.
History, as a story, is a subject worth
running the Trivium backwards, rhetoric
first. All the things we do not like to see in
movies (because Babylon Hollywood is the
instructor) we can do with history. We can inflame, inspire, wax marvelous and bring
to tears.
The Nature of History
We have to realize that history is a
Tale of Humanism and the Pride of Life.
We are riveted by greatness when it comes
to history and Wat the Swineherd in
Turtle-on-Damp, Sussex is no match for
Alexander the Great. Both men yes, but
only one showed the level to which man's
greatness can rise. A man's passion for
dominance in juxtaposition to others is the
plot of this story. Certainly some have
written histories of sociological movements
and pottery fragments but they don't have a
story, only the background of the story.
The Nature of Man
The Pride of Life is one of our basic
urges along with the Desires of the Flesh
and Eyes. What has this to do with
history? Every man seeks his kingdom.
His kingdom is that region inside which his
law can be policed effectively. Our self
assessment is constantly wondering if we
are man enough to police a greater territory
yet. Our legions mobilize to march on
whoever is next door. Homeless men fight
over cardboard boxes, suburban men
challenge neighbors over property lines
(one of my relatives died in a gunfight in
Yazoo City, Mississippi in just such a
disagreement) and nations go out to
conquer.
This is not only territorial but it is also
in the intellectual and financial world,
wherever man can control and dominate. A
man's greatness is the size of his kingdom.
In the world of the Pride of Life "'He who
dies with the most toys wins." Just as
with wealth (the ability to command the
labor of others), greatness has the
measurement of how many men owe you
knight service. The realms established by
every man, singly and severally, eventually
and often bump into each other. We
want the same piece of real estate and
battles are bound to occur on the boundary
between the kingdoms. In the greatest
of these encounters is the cast of the
story of History.
The Nature of Glory
Just as beauty is the emotion of art,
glory is the emotion of greatness. You
know already it has to do with weight and
we look for moments where the particular
mass of a particular greatness comes home
to us. Six thousand years are filled with mundanities and pedestrian conflict which
do not rise to epic proportion, the size
needed to guide our story of "what
happened." So where in history do we
find such moment? On the anvil of
greatnesses meeting we hammer out glory.
A basic urge to dominate is sometimes
lived to a great degree and it eventually
meets another who challenges the line between their rule and men sacrifice their
very lives on that line to win or lose the
day. We like the feeling but not the serious
cost of life and limb so we have invented
game and sport. Make an artificial line,
compete over it and then call our MVPs
''heroes." But the plastic trophies came from
something. On a pole surrounded by the
dead of your enemies you could hang
pieces of their annour ... only if you won.
There the line between real kingdoms is the
distillate of the fermentation of shed blood.
And it is intoxicating and the theme of
history. It is history to be remembered.
"In the spring of the year, the time
when kings go forth to battle"
II
Samuel 11:1
Battle is the ultimate moment in the
seeking of boundaries. Man always wants
to know if the line he defends can be
stepped beyond or if that one step wiII
mean defeat. It is the focus of the passion
of the greatest force in the story of
history. The great battles then stir us
deeply. They excite us, but it is the
excitement natural to the forces we study.
We are supposed to share in this excitement.
There are two kinds who play a role in
history: the great and the decisive.
- The
Great:
These are battles that of a scale, and a
portent that plays to the territorial concerns
of notable belligerents (generals or nations).
They are deep with personalities and tactics
and causes pertinent to the time. It mattered
much to them but little to us because they
are making, self-consciously, the history of
their "nation" but not the history, consciously
or otherwise, of the world.
- The Decisive:
These battles, always great battles, are the ones that punctuate
the curriculum of world history as the
beginning of a new paragraph or merely a
new sentence. The outcome of these
battles matters to where history goes (to
us) and matter more to this engine of man's
pride than the men fighting could possibly
realize. Like with the prophesies of the Old
Testament where the prophets did not know of the things they spoke, we, upon
whom the end of the ages has come, we
know these battles' import. We study the
backgrounds of the antagonists and
measure the hardest fought with greatest
device at what ultimate cost and sacrifice.
The meditation of the equation written in
the decisive battles basks in the weight of
history, the glory of the epic of man.
What have we done to the student
of History?
We have excited him. He wants to
know what came after and what led up. He
wants to know the logic of these times and
even the grammar. What is a legion? A
Pilum? A housecarl? The Hiemskringla?
You tell him or he reads the answer and
tucks it away in his excited imagination.
He will want to know of great men and
great deeds. He will come back to you
with information you did not know and of
battles you had not studied.
George Santayana said, "Those who
cannot remember the past are condemned
to repeat it."
A tragic truism but utter bosh
when you watch the Spartans combing their
hair for death at Thennopylae.
Our students who have honored the
glory should be hopefully thinking, "Those
who cannot remember the past are
condemned to NOT repeat it."
Evan Wilson pastors All Souls Christian
Church, ministers in philosophy and culture
to college students at The Big Haus (a
Christian boarding house), and works in
graphics through his business Trireme d'Sign.
He has taught ancient history at Logos School
and Montrose Academy, both in Moscow,
Idaho, and is the author of the two volume A
Biblical Antiquity.
|