1. This chapter discusses the of simple apprehension.
2. The two properties of simple apprehension are:

1.
2.

3. N/A
4. N/A
5. Aristotle's tongue in cheek definition of man was a .
6. N/A
7. The problem with Aristotle's definition is that it doesn't tell us many things about what makes up his .
8. Comprehension can be defined as the completely articulated of the aspects, or (or notes) represented by a concept.
9. 'Sentient' means that something has , such as sight, hearing, etc.; 'material' means a thing has a ; substance means that a thing is rather than .
10. The simple concepts we use to define a complex concept are called .
11. N/A
12. Using the idea of comprehension, the answer to the question "What is an animal" is "A , , substance."
13. The concept man has [?] notes.
14. Using the idea of comprehension, the answer to the question, “What is a man?” is "A , , , substance."
15. The diagram invented by the 3rd century logician Porphry is called the .
16. Porphry’s invention gives us a convenient way to break down a complex concept into concepts out of which it is made.
17. N/A
18. N/A
19. N/A
20. The second of the two properties of simple apprehension we study in this chapter is
21. The answer to the question, “What is the extension of the concept man?” is "All the men who , who , and who ."
22. The answer to the question, “What is the extension of the concept animal” is "All the animals who , , or ."
23. Comprehension tells us what the of a thing is; extension tells us the things to which that essence .
24. N/A
25. N/A
26. N/A
27. N/A
28. The more comprehension a concept has, the extension it has; and the extension it has, the less the comprehension.
29. N/A
30. The comprension of the concept automobile is "a non-living ."
31. The extension of the concept automobile is "all the automobiles that , or ."
32. N/A